Current:Home > MarketsArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -EquityZone
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-18 03:26:00
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (414)
Related
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Why Diddy is facing 'apocalyptic' legal challenges amid 6 new sexual assault civil suits
- McCormick and Casey disagree on abortion, guns and energy in their last debate
- Liam Payne's family mourns One Direction star's death at 31: 'Heartbroken'
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- Lonzo Ball makes triumphant return for first NBA game since Jan. 2022
- US law entitles immigrant children to an education. Some conservatives say that should change
- Feds: Cyber masterminds targeted FBI, CNN, Hulu, Netflix, Microsoft, X in global plot
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Krispy Kreme introduces special supermoon doughnut for one-day only: How to get yours
Ranking
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Ex-husband of ‘Real Housewives’ star gets seven years for hiring mobster to assault her boyfriend
- Olivia Rodrigo shakes off falling through trapdoor during concert: Watch the moment
- Two SSI checks are coming in November, but none in December. You can blame the calendar.
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Mexico’s former public security chief set to be sentenced in US drug case
- Liam Payne's Preliminary Cause of Death Revealed
- 1000-Lb. Sisters' Amy Slaton Shares New Photos of Her Kids After Arrest
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
There's a big Ozempic controversy brewing online. Doctors say it's the 'wild west.'
Jill Biden is out campaigning again — but not for her husband anymore. She’s pumping up Harris
What's terrifying enough to freak out a horror writer? 10 authors pick the scariest books
San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
Why Kristin Cavallari Thinks Celebs Like Kanye West and Britney Spears Have Been Cloned
Bella Hadid Makes Angelic Return to Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show
JD Vance quips that Donald Trump will 'stop' rumored Skyline Chili ice cream flavor