Current:Home > MyMosquitoes spread malaria. These researchers want them to fight it instead -EquityZone
Mosquitoes spread malaria. These researchers want them to fight it instead
View
Date:2025-04-16 16:39:45
Mosquitoes carry malaria, which kills hundreds of thousands of people each year. Now some researchers are trying to use genetic engineering to make the pesky insects into allies in the fight against the disease.
The approach is a radical departure from traditional ways of controlling malaria. For years, public health officials have tried to limit the disease by controlling mosquito populations.
But that approach is temporary, says Anthony James, a professor of molecular biology and genetics at the University of California, Irvine. Because mosquitoes are extremely tough little insects, and their populations can quickly rebound.
"To try to get rid of them, I don't think it's possible," he says. Instead, James and his colleagues want to try a different approach: making mosquitoes themselves into malaria-fighting warriors.
To understand how it works, it helps to understand the life cycle of malaria. The malaria pathogen is a parasite that grows inside humans. It's transmitted via mosquitoes that flit from person to person, sucking blood (the parasites also reproduce inside the guts of skeeters).
"If we can make the mosquitoes inhospitable to the pathogens, you know, we can eliminate the threat of getting the disease," he says.
But making mosquitoes uninviting to malaria is a tough job. The malaria parasite doesn't make mosquitoes sick, so mosquito immune systems don't fight it.
To get around the problem, the team used a gene-editing technique called CRISPR. They started with genes from mice, whose immune systems do fight human malaria.
"What we did then was engineer those [genes], and give them to the mosquitos," he says.
The results were published this month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Sure enough, the gene-edited mosquitos produced malaria-fighting antibodies.
Those antibodies "worked very well," says James. "They reduce the number of parasites in the mosquito, most importantly in the salivary gland, which is where they would be before they were transmitted to a human host."
This technique also allows the researchers to make the genes spread quickly. That means, rather than having to release swarms of gene-edited mosquitos, they could put out a smaller number. The engineered mosquitoes mate, pass on their genetic code, and that code rapidly fans out across the wild population.
But genetically altering wild animals does not sit well with environmentalists.
"There's no need to engineer a mosquito," says Dana Perls, senior program manager for the emerging technology program at the non-profit Friends of the Earth. Perls points out that naturally occurring methods for reducing malaria appear to be showing promise, as does a new vaccine against the disease.
"Why take unnecessary risks and release a manipulated species that can't be recalled once it's released into the wild?" she asks.
Anthony James believes the risks would be very low. The mosquitoes are already part of the ecosystem, and the gene alterations wouldn't affect much other than their response to malaria, he says. Moreover, it's better than sprays and treatments that control mosquitoes temporarily.
"This is potentially a much more sustainable technology," he says.
His lab is now working on planning a field trial, which he hopes could be conducted on an island or in another isolated location.
veryGood! (965)
Related
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- With student loan forgiveness in limbo, here's how the GOP wants to fix college debt
- See RHOBH's Kyle Richards and Kathy Hilton's Sweet Family Reunion Amid Ongoing Feud
- Coastal Flooding Is Erasing Billions in Property Value as Sea Level Rises. That’s Bad News for Cities.
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- These Texas DAs refused to prosecute abortion. Republican lawmakers want them stopped
- Trump’s Repeal of Stream Rule Helps Coal at the Expense of Climate and Species
- Surge in Mississippi River Hydro Proposals Points to Coming Boom
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Idaho dropped thousands from Medicaid early in the pandemic. Which state's next?
Ranking
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- John Stamos Shares the Heart-Melting Fatherhood Advice Bob Saget Gave Him About Son Billy
- Why hundreds of doctors are lobbying in Washington this week
- Why Arnold Schwarzenegger Thinks He and Maria Shriver Deserve an Oscar for Their Divorce
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- The Truth About the Future of The Real Housewives of New Jersey
- Hispanic dialysis patients are more at risk for staph infections, the CDC says
- How financial counseling at the pediatrician's office can help families thrive
Recommendation
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
New EPA Rule Change Saves Industry Money but Exacts a Climate Cost
Fossil Fuels (Not Wildfires) Biggest Source of a Key Arctic Climate Pollutant, Study Finds
Florida high school athletes won't have to report their periods after emergency vote
Travis Hunter, the 2
Spinal stimulation can improve arm and hand movement years after a stroke
California child prodigy on his SpaceX job: The work I'm going to be doing is so cool
Insurance-like Product Protects Power Developers from Windless Days